The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The given graph consists of the data from Burnaby Public Library comparing the number of books read by men and women for the period of 4 years from 2011 to 2014
From the graph, we can note that there has been a significant rise in the number of books read by men. It is also clear that though the number of books read by women gradually rose at the beginning, it dropped after 2013. So as a whole, books read by women exceeded men by nearly 2000 in 2011 whereas the data finishes off by men leading women by 7000 books in 2014.
Looking at the book count read by men, it shows a consistent rise. However, steep rise is observed between 2012 and 2013 when it increased from 4000 books to 10000 books. Thus men started by reading 3000 books in 2011 and ended up reading 14000 books in 2014 which is an increase by 11000 books
Meanwhile, 5000 books were read by women in 2011 and after a consistent rise in 2012 and 2013 to 7000 and 9000 books respectively, it faced a dip to 7000 books in 2014. But there is a positive difference of 2000 books read by women between 2011 and 2014.. It is also interesting to find that the number of books read by both men and women is same in the year of 201
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y Public Library comparing the number of books read by men and women for the peri...
^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...creased from 4000 books to 10000 books. Thus men started by reading 3000 books in 20...
^^^^
Line 7, column 254, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...ooks read by women between 2011 and 2014.. It is also interesting to find that the...
^^
Line 7, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd that the number of books read by both men and women is same in the year of 201...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, thus, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.19913419913 4.92477711251 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.12284591203 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467532467532 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.6240188323 43.030603864 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.25 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.875 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390924221803 0.215688989381 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.205906230796 0.103423049105 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886194553051 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29742360145 0.15604864568 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636022338375 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 85.36 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.67 11.4140731707 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.94 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.