The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The line graph compares between three different ways by which the Tourist Information Office received enquiries, consisting of person, letter/mail along with telephone during the first 6 months of 2011.
It is obvious that face-to-face communication was by far the most important means of the way for customers to enquiry over the period shown. By contrast, the total number of inquiries via letter or email was the lowest after February in 2011.
In January, inquiring through telephone was the main way to reach out the Tourist Information Office, at roughly 900 enquiries. Meanwhile, around 800 inquiries were sent to the office by letter/email, which was almost double the number of questions asked in person. Over the following 6 months, however letter/email inquiries figures fell by approximately 400 units, whereas face-to-face asking circumstances saw an impressively considerable increase by close to 1500 enquiries.
By the end of the surveyed period, enquiries in person had become the most popular tendency as it overtook either letter/email or telephone with respect to ways of enquiry in March and April respectively. In fact, the quantity of inquiries through telephone that the office received saw a fluctuation during the first 3 months of the period, and then gradually rose dramatically to a peak of 1600 units in June.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 46, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... obvious that face-to-face communication was by far the most important means of t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then, whereas, while, in fact, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35377358491 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05072737593 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608490566038 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3332493279 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.875 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.23603664747 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169121599267 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762209661035 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440277926246 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111375309242 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373246050096 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.