The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph shows the information about how many inquires received by the Tourist Information Office in a particular city from January to June in 2011.
It is clear from the line graph that the number of inquiries in person experienced the most dramatic change during the research period. Additionally, while the figure for letter decreased, there were sharp increases in the number of inquire in person and by telephone.
In January, the Tourist Information Office received about 900 inquiries from telephone, while the figure for letter started at just under 800. Approximately 450 inquires in person were chosen by tourist. Over the next three months, the number for telephone increased slightly and then it leveled off at 1000 inquires until April, whereas there was a significant growth in the figure in person, around 1200.
From April to June, the office received inquires in person continued to rise sharply to 1900, which was the highest figure of three means of communication. By contrast, the number for letter went in the opposite direction and it reached the lowest point of only under 400.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10989010989 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63452228004 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554945054945 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5199946695 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.25 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183918267385 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867131465842 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888646711534 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136174563077 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100614529088 0.0819641961636 123% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.