The line graph demonstrates the data about how the tourist office centre received the enquiries through three distinct sources from January to June during the year of 2011.
Overall, it is palpable that the officer was able to come to know about the maximum number of enquiries through the person, compared with the letter and telephone.
Initially, above 400 enquiries were received through individual which were increased gradually and become 800 on march. After 3 months, it rose to all round 1900 which were 3 times more than those enquiries which posted through the telephone.
Analysing further, the range of investigations started near to 800 through letter and telephone but eventually, the enquiries especially through letter gradually declined and reached upto a least number (400) on June, whereas throughout six months, after the person, telephone became able to elevate the range of enquiries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...une during the year of 2011. Overall, it is palpable that the officer was able...
^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ter gradually declined and reached upto a least number 400 on June, whereas throu...
^
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: LEAST_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'least numb'?
Suggestion: least numb
...r gradually declined and reached upto a least number 400 on June, whereas throughout six mon...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 771.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 143.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39160839161 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45807182446 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61044370805 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.8717808097 43.030603864 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.2 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168979922278 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947173033305 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604365802377 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10880568941 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588574114445 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.