The graph below shows the number of passengers railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004/5.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph compares the number of passengers using three different types of the railway in Great Britain, from 1950 to 2005.
Overall, while the use of the national railway and London Underground fluctuated all over the time, the light rail and metro systems witnessed an increasing pattern. A vast majority of passengers prefer to use the national rail network.
The light rail and metro systems only appeared in the 1960s and carried insignificant passengers at that time. In 1980, this kind of railway reached its lowest point at approximately none travelers; however, it dramatically rose to nearly 175 million people in 1985 and continued to climb up. This figure already rocketed to 220 passengers in 2005.
In 1050, the national railway already transported 1000 million people while London Underground conveyed 700 million. This figure for the national railway peaked at 1,100 million travelers as the highest point, since then it collapsed significantly and increased again in 1983. Passengers of London Underground remained unchanged in 1975 and declined in 1975 and reached its lowest point at 500 million. But then, it leaped substantially in the next 30 years, almost equal to the passengers of the national railway in 1989 and 2000. By the end of 2005, the travelers of London Underground surpassed that of the national rail network.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, then, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27397260274 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7603636713 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538812785388 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6121056618 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107004961011 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478460193129 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582611625096 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905493075642 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0785174527075 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.