The pie chart below show units of electricity production in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare units of fuel sources which uses to generate electricity in Australia and France in two years: 1980 and 2000.
Overall, the total production of both countries experienced an upward trend. Additionally, while Australia promoted the consumption of coal, France increased the consumption of nuclear power.
The units of coal used to produce electricity in Australia rose by 80 units after two years, this figure for hydropower also increased slightly up to 36%. Oil and natural gas, in contrast, witnessed a significant decline by 10 times lower and only 2 unis of them were used in 2000.
Coal and natural gas were the two main sources to generate electricity in France in 1980, which was 25 units. However, in 2000, while coal remained its units, natural gas collapsed significantly to 2 units after two years. Hydropower declined by 3 units whereas oil climbed tediously by 5 units. Nuclear, especially, experienced a remarkable increase in consumption since its units in 2000 were 10 times higher than the 1980's and stood at 126 units in 2000.
In conclusion, while Australia kept focusing on producing electricity by coal, France altered the main source form coal and natural gas to nuclear power.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, whereas, while, as to, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14427860697 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82152282723 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547263681592 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.255597755 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.4 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214798248375 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954881075581 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701702080965 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141695147646 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740845478 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.