The graph gives information about visitors who visit island in Caribbean region from 2010 to 2017 in 2 different categories.
Overall, both categories had fluctuations in given time period. Initially, people like to stay on island but at the end this become less popular then another category.
At the start, quarter millions people liked to stay on cruise ship ( which is one third of other category). After 1 year people had more influence towards the island and number of people lived on island became double of last year. Additionally, it had decrement for next year but after one year in 2013 it reached to 0.5 million people. Then after, this rate outraced the rate of people who visited the cruise between 2015 & 2016. Finally, at the end of the given time period it reached to 2 million visitors.
In 2010, approximately three quarter of million people loved cruise stay and this rate stay stabled till 2011. In next 3 year time period, it showed increased rate and reached to 1.5 million people, but between 2015 & 2016 it experienced downward trend and reached to approx 1.25 million and at the end it became 1.5 million people who visited it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...7 in 2 different categories. Overall, both categories had fluctuations in give...
^^
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uations in given time period. Initially, people like to stay on island but at the...
^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...but at the end this become less popular then another category. At the start, quar...
^^^^
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ions people liked to stay on cruise ship which is one third of other category. A...
^^
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecame double of last year. Additionally, it had decrement for next year but after...
^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment for next year but after one year in 2013 it reached to 0.5 million people. T...
^^
Line 7, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his rate stay stabled till 2011. In next 3 year time period, it showed increased ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, then, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84848484848 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43565186346 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4684157577 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108352250771 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489820023054 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697385475431 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943077591348 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0864096821792 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.