The graph below shows the percentage of mobile phone owners using various mobile phone features in Vietnam in the year 2005, 2008, 2010.
The table illustrates the proportion of people using their phone for differents function in the year 2005, 2008 and 2010 in VietNam
It is clear that, most of figure in the table decreased in the last year except the data for take photos. Also, almost cellphone user utilising their phone to make calls over the period shown.
As can be seen from the chart, starting at 65% in 2005, the number of people used phone to take photos witnessed a slightly rose to 70% in 2008 and then continued to grow to 77% at the end of the period. By contrast, in 2005, over three-quarter of mobile phone owner made use of record audio, this function was least popular choice for people in 2010 at only 63%
Out of the other features, 100% cellphone possessors made call in 2005 and 2008 but this figure fell marginally in the next 2 years by 3%. Meanwhile, Send& receive text message was the second common function in 2005 at 82% before declined gradually to only 68% in the last year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the year 2005, 2008 and 2010 in VietNam It is clear that, most of figure in the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 114, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('rose') instead of another adjective.
...ple used phone to take photos witnessed a slightly rose to 70% in 2008 and then continued to gr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 308, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the least'.
Suggestion: was the least
...made use of record audio, this function was least popular choice for people in 2010 at on...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 363, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ar choice for people in 2010 at only 63% Out of the other features, 100% cellphon...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58192090395 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30206404491 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610169491525 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.2217816638 43.030603864 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.2 112.824112599 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.4 22.9334400587 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281906538921 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136364890846 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732029124669 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173740408185 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927628917296 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.33 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.88 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.