The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares the number of goods shipped using four modes of transport in the UK over the 28-year period.
It is noticeable that there was an upward trend in all modes of transportation. Road was by far the most chosen way of shipping goods over the period.
In the initial year, road was regarded as the main shipping way in the UK, allocated to carry 70 million tonnes of goods. Water and rail shared an approximate figure of 40 million tonnes of goods, which was almost 50% lower than the figure for road, whereas the quantities of goods conveyed via pipeline were just 10 million tonnes. In 1978, the amount of goods shipped via water rose dramatically, overtaking railway for the entire period.
From 1978 onwards, goods transported by road fluctuated before peaking at nearly 100 million tonnes in 2002, maintaining its dominant position in goods shipment. The same pattern was shown for railway, but its figure in the last year remained the same as in the beginning, while goods shipped via water continued its growth at 60 million tonnes, being the second commonly used modes of transport. Despite increasing gradually, the figure for pipeline was still unnoticeable, remaining its last position of all time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of goods conveyed via pipeline were just 10 million tonnes. In 1978, the amount o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95652173913 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57412230221 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584541062802 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9607355139 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13802831306 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663816206139 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626211361308 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105274345537 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688607854599 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.