The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport
Summirise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the amount of goods that was transported by four different means of transportation in the UK between 1974 and 2002. All measures in million tons.
Overall, it can be seen that, despite some fluctuations, over the period as a whole the amount of transported goods rose by all four types of transport.
Road transportation stood at about 70 in 1974 while water transportation accounted for approximately 38. Then they both increased with some fluctuation over the next 24 years to about 50 (water) and 95 (road). For the following 4 years road transportation raised slightly to finish the period at just under 100 while water transportation experienced gradual growth and accounted for about 64 the same year.
With regards to rail and pipeline transportation, they begun at 40 and 5 in 1974. However, for the next 21 years the gap closed as the pipeline transportation climber exponentially to about 21 by 1995 while rail transportation declined with some fluctuation to about 24. Then for the following 7 years pipeline transportations stayed constant, by contrast, rail transportation witnessed significant improvement to finish period at just under 40.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...between 1974 and 2002. All measures in million tons. Overall, it can be seen that,...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 56, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'began'?
Suggestion: began
... rail and pipeline transportation, they begun at 40 and 5 in 1974. However, for the n...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25789473684 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35335859258 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557894736842 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1325471192 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14947872048 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785435938559 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102317781909 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130073219686 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101372234934 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.