The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table compares the usage of different types of transportation by the UK citizens in 1985 and 2000. All measures are in miles per person.
Overall, it can be seen that people in England travelled more in 2000 than in 1985 and that taxi mode experienced the most significant changes.
In England, average distance travelled by cur was at 3199 then for the next 25 years the average distance rose significantly to 4806. The usage of long distance bus rose more than two times from 54 in 1985 to 124 in 2000. Average distance by train and other modes of travel rose for approximately 130 and it accounted for 366 and 585 in 2000 respectively. People travelled by taxy 3 times more in 2000 than in 1985.
People used bicycle and local bus less that in 1985, which accounted for 41 and 274 in 2000. In 1985, each citizen in England walked 255 miles a year, by contrast, in 2000 it comprised of 237. Each Briton travelled by local bus 429 miles a year while in 2000 it constituted 274 miles.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 813.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49171270718 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56059318621 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541436464088 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5252279928 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170677804169 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781876163457 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399753174175 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112185651353 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201511402461 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.