The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tones, from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007.
The line graph compares the levels of acid rain emissions produced by four main sectors namely transportation, domestic, energy supply, and other industries, in the UK form 1990 to 2007.
Overall, it is evident that over the period as a whole the levels of produced emissions resulted in acid rain decreased considerably for all sectors, except for the sector of transport and communication fluctuated.
While acid rain emissions from the energy supply (electricity, gas, and water) stood at 3.4 millions of tones in 1991, which was the highest rate, followed by other industries sector with 2.1 million tones, the emissions produced by domestic and transportation system were the lowest ones and roughly similar at 0.6 and 0.7, respectively. However, these trends changed significantly at the end of the period (2007) when other industries sector took the first place with the emissions producing at 1.3 million tones, followed by the sector of transportation at the same rate as the starting level. The greatest decline in acid rain emissions belonged to the energy supply by a 2.8 million tone drop. There was also a slight fall in the domestic sector, reaching 0.3 in 2007.
Regarding the communication system sector, the trend was a small fluctuation over the 16-year period. However, after experiencing two years of stability, the production of rain acid emissions by other industries sector decreased gradually, reaching 1.3 in 2007. Similarly, the domestic sector had almost the same trend, declining slightly to 0.3. Finally, there was a significant drop in emissions produced by the energy sector, reaching 0.5 in 2007.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '4 million'.
Suggestion: 4 million
... electricity, gas, and water stood at 3.4 millions of tones in 1991, which was the highest ra...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'industries'' or 'industry's'?
Suggestion: industries'; industry's
...was the highest rate, followed by other industries sector with 2.1 million tones, the emis...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 423, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'industries'' or 'industry's'?
Suggestion: industries'; industry's
...t the end of the period 2007 when other industries sector took the first place with the em...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 202, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'industries'' or 'industry's'?
Suggestion: industries'; industry's
...duction of rain acid emissions by other industries sector decreased gradually, reaching 1....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 452, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he energy sector, reaching 0.5 in 2007.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, regarding, similarly, so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 965.302439024 143% => OK
No of words: 260.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29615384615 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88879440876 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523076923077 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 283.868780488 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.437519367 43.030603864 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.0 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8888888889 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251960047958 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120754966226 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596176731747 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167294044919 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678281603316 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.