The graph below shows the value in thousands of three companies selling farming equipment every five years from 1960 and their projected value from 2007 to 2012. Farm Implements Ltd did not start trading until 1980.
The bar chart below gives information about three companies selling farming tools from 1960 to their projected value in thousands. Overall, Greenacres Ltd Co. had more values than two other companies. The Farm Implements Ltd had a steadily increase in selling, while Carsons Ltd from 1960 until 1980 did not any trading.
As can see, for Greenacres Ltd Co. the most selling values were related to 1990 with about 4005 dollars and in 2012 like. In the projected years (2007-2012) for this company, there was an upward trend from about 3000 dollars to just over 4000 dollars in 2007 to 2012 respectively.
The other figures were related to Farm Implements Ltd Co. the obvious point for this company is from 1960. Before 1980 there was not any selling, but after that, there was an increasing trend in trade of farming equipment for it with minimum quantity (1000 dollar) in 1980 and maximum one was about 3500 dollar.
The other company that mentioned in this chart is Carsons Ltd Co. that shown with a line graph. The trend of selling for this company fluctuated, the highest point was 1500 in 2012 and the least one was just under 500 dollar in 1960.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steadily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
... companies. The Farm Implements Ltd had a steadily increase in selling, while Carsons Ltd from 1960...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
...pment for it with minimum quantity 1000 dollar in 1980 and maximum one was about 3500 ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
... in 1980 and maximum one was about 3500 dollar. The other company that mentioned in...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 219, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
...12 and the least one was just under 500 dollar in 1960.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78109452736 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25586645044 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537313432836 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.741182112 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.777777778 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.55555555556 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366844457659 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164542586324 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0998179852211 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227755300659 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120757353131 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.