The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year.
The two charts below illustrate the quantity of expenditure and revenue sources that a children’s charity in the USA spends and received them in a year. Overall, most expenditures were for program service, while more than 80 percent of revenue sources were for donated food. The program services with 95.8 % and donated food with 86.6 percent are allocated more quantity respectively.
As can see, after program services that mentioned above, fundraising with 2.6 % and after that management and general part with 1.6 percent made income for his charity. Therefore, more income used for program services.
Turning to other pie chart shows us other parts of income that named revenue sources, except donated food other parts such as community contribution and program revenue with 10.4 and 2.2 percent respectively gained more percentage, while government grants and investment, and of course other sources of income are allocated to themselves a minimum proportion.
In total, the proportion for revenue sources with $53,561 was more than expenditure part with $53.224.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, therefore, while, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50602409639 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7694887664 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566265060241 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 92.1673278691 43.030603864 214% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 130.571428571 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0779931693183 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442581179396 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875106697792 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0418597199478 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460438847996 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.