The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year.

Essay topics:

The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year.

The pie charts illustrate the amount of money in revenue and expenditures of a children’s charity in the USA in a year. Overall, it is evident that the organization received a lot of donated food and spent much money on program serviced.

It can be seen from the first pie chart that the total amount of money the organization received was approximately 53 million, including 9 different sources. Donated food was the biggest source, accounting for just over 85 percent and the second biggest source was community contributions, creating around 10 percent. The rest of sources did not significantly contribute, making about just under 3 percent in each source.

The organization spent about 53 million in a year on program services, fundraising, management and general. The most largest amount of money spending on program services, at around 95 percent. The figure for fundraising, management and general was about 4 percent.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... spent much money on program serviced. It can be seen from the first pie chart ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t just under 3 percent in each source. The organization spent about 53 million ...
^^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s, fundraising, management and general. The most largest amount of money spending o...
^^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'largest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: largest
...undraising, management and general. The most largest amount of money spending on program ser...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the largest'.
Suggestion: most the largest
...undraising, management and general. The most largest amount of money spending on program ser...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...program services, at around 95 percent. The figure for fundraising, management and ...
^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gement and general was about 4 percent.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 792.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13687742827 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586666666667 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3459963198 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24509952399 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117919438611 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140696891688 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199168308422 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154761015605 0.0819641961636 189% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.