The line graph demonstrates the information about how the rates related to the waste recycling have been changed, especially in the United Kingdom over 51 years from 1960 to 2011.
Overall, it is palpable that the recycling rate in the form of proportion was minimum in comparison with sum of recovered wastage.
Discerning the graph, the recycling rate was lied upto 6.4% , while the majority reprocessed rubbish was above 5 million tons during 1960.After 15 years, its percentile rate was gradually inclined and reached upto 9.6% and 10% particularly in 1980 and 1985.However, its total recovered wastage covered the maximum million tons which just near to 15 million tons.
Analysing further, its sum recycled rubbish material was burgeoned from 33.2 million tons to 79.8 million tons between beside 20 years but in 2011, that rose to 86.0 million tons which was 3.2 million tons more than the wastage recovery of 2005.Furthermore, from 1990 and 2011, its percentage rate was lied upto 16.0% and 34.7% respectively as well as 34.7% was more than the half percentile of national recycling rate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'lain'.
Suggestion: lain
...rning the graph, the recycling rate was lied upto 6.4% , while the majority reproces...
^^^^
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...h, the recycling rate was lied upto 6.4% , while the majority reprocessed rubbish ...
^^
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: After
...sh was above 5 million tons during 1960.After 15 years, its percentile rate was gradu...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d reached upto 9.6% and 10% particularly in 1980 and 1985.However, its total reco...
^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
... and 10% particularly in 1980 and 1985.However, its total recovered wastage covered th...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
... more than the wastage recovery of 2005.Furthermore, from 1990 and 2011, its percentage rat...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 303, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'lain'.
Suggestion: lain
... 1990 and 2011, its percentage rate was lied upto 16.0% and 34.7% respectively as we...
^^^^
Line 7, column 404, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore than the half percentile of national recycling rate.
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rcentile of national recycling rate.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22905027933 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75167737845 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597765363128 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 22.4926829268 196% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 121.443402456 43.030603864 282% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 234.0 112.824112599 207% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 44.75 22.9334400587 195% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5 5.23603664747 258% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175154268691 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131506707547 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669040211646 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131506707547 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669040211646 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.6 13.2329268293 193% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.28 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 10.3012195122 187% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.9970731707 178% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.