The graph show modes of transport to and from work in one European city in 1950, 1970 and 1990.
This bar graph indicates the percentage of people in a city in Europe who took four different kinds of transport, to get to and from their job in 1950, 1970 and 1990.
The most significant trend in this time period was the increase in the use of cars. In 1950, only about 5% of travellers used a car to go to and from work, but this rose to 25% in 1970 and to over 35% in 1990. On the other hand, there was a decrease in the number of people travelling on foot. In 1950, about one in three people walked to and from work, but this fell to around 20% in 1970 and to a very low 5% in 1990. Similarly, travelling by bike declined dramatically in this period from approximately 26% in 1950 to around 4% in 1990. Regarding bus travel, the trend was quite different. The popularity of the bus first increased to 25%, and then declined to about the same level in 1990 as in 1950 (22%).
In general, it can be said that in the period 1950 to 1990 the use of cars to travel to and from work increased dramatically, while the popularity of other forms of transport either declined or remained constant.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, similarly, then, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 33.7804878049 175% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.23923444976 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45995374962 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507177033493 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7437146424 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4444444444 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321811173842 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133235137852 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111319065337 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231048424073 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446838519992 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.61 11.4140731707 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.74 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.