The given line graph compares the percentage of people who age 65 and over from 1940 to 2040 in USA, Sweden, Japan.
On the whole, we can see from the graph that all three nations experience an upward trend irrespective of the given years, although three of which fluctuate in terms of the number of population throughout the given period.
Turning to detail, USA had the largest percentage of 65 and over-year-old people in 1940, accounting for nearly 10%. However, this number will be the least in 2040(22%) with comparison to other two nations. The striking point is that Japan is forecasted to hold the maximum proportion of people who age 65 and over in 2040, culminating at around 27%, although it underwent the least number of population aging 65 and over in 1940.
It is salient to observe that the percentage of 65 and over-year-old population of USA intersected with that of Sweden between 1980 and 2000, at around 14%. By the same token, Japan would overlap the USA and Sweden with regard to the number of elderly population, with 18% and 21%, respectively.
- Even though doctors all over the world agree that fast food is bad for people's health, more and more people are eating it. Why are more people eating fast food? What can be done about this problem? (Rewrite) 73
- The table shows the tourist numbers and tourist spending in five countries in 2012 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 60
- Many people believe that educational standards have declined in recent times, particularly in the areas of literacy and numeracy. Discuss the causes of this problem and offer some possible solutions to it. 78
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people think the government should spend money on technology while the others think it should be for free education. Discuss both views and give your idea. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, on the whole, with regard to, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82702702703 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69189189189 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551351351351 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3326898285 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.571428571 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316679751798 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140551441921 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115766877441 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18639836391 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823378577899 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.