The graphs above give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comp

Essay topics:

The graphs above give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given bar graphs illustrate how the number of people who possess computer varied by educational level, and between period 2002 and 2010.

To begin with, according to the chart which was classified by period, it is clearly seen that the figure of people who have a computer had been increasing as time goes by. The percentages of population had been expanding stably from 2002 to 2010. Approximately 70 per cent people possessed a computer in 2010.

Meanwhile, according to the bar chart by education level, it seems that the percentages of population had been rising up steadily as people get higher education level. The highest figure was postgraduate qualification at around 80% and 90% in 2002 and 2010 respectively. The lowest percentage was no high school diploma at about 15%, 40% in 2002, 2010 each.

In conclusion, the number of people who own computer tended to grow as time goes by. Furthermore, as people get higher education level, the figure of population increased more and more.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, while, in conclusion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02994011976 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82069616712 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556886227545 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8362292904 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26196854899 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123708831315 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731968876481 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175382330277 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680152578252 0.0819641961636 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.