he maps below give information about a school in 2004 and the change of the same school in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words
Present the graphs illustrating the different of a school in two given years (2004 and 2010). Overall, the number of school building was constructed more than In comparison with both the two maps.
We can witness little changes in north-west toward. The top-right of map in 2004 is only school building, where it was used to purpose study; however, the type of building was expanded more than additional estimate of two buildings in 2010. The erection of the building took place with some reasons like the total of increasing students or improving manufacture. In the west toward, the construction of new car park appeared; accordingly, it makes the main road have some changes like from the distance of car park to outside road into a distance between two car parks.
On the other hand, sport field in center of the map(2004)was cut down the size of the space to expand school building in2010; nevertheless, if walking path in 2004 connected to sport field, it was reconstructed walking path from only road into three road and create a strangle between the buildings. In top right toward, the car park still stayed unchanged with tree on the surrounded campus.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...om only road into three road and create a strangle between the buildings. In top right tow...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89847715736 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66064429425 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568527918782 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.5331053248 43.030603864 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.625 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123686272303 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056324351267 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459846148505 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926633127431 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417042861287 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.