The tables compare five different countries in terms of their Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas sales in 1999 and 2004.
Overall, all five countries experienced a different extent of growth in their sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas except Sweden and Denmark, which sold fewer products in 2004 than in 1999. The UK and Switzerland sold the highest number of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 2004, respectively.
As the table shows, Switzerland sold more coffee than other countries in 1999 at 3 million euros, followed by Denmark, the UK, Belgium, and Sweden at 1.8, 1.5, 1, and 0.8 million euros respectively. However, the UK surpassed Switzerland in 2004, with the sales of coffee at 20 million euros. The sales of coffee in Switzerland increased, standing at 6 million euros, followed by Denmark, Belgium, and Sweden at 2, 1.7, and 1 million euros, respectively.
Regarding the sales of bananas, Switzerland ranked first in both 1999 and 2004 at 15 and 47 million euros. The sales in the UK and Belgium also increased from 1 and 0.6 million euros to 5.5 and 4 million euros, respectively. By contrast, the sales of bananas in Sweden and Denmark slightly decreased from 1.8 and 2 million euros to 1 and 0.9 million euros, respectively.
- Many governments think that economic progress is most important goal some people however think that other types of progress and equally important for a country 61
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 67
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 73
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, regarding, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 6.8 265% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11538461538 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17540706984 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.432692307692 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2379734501 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.222222222 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278714785488 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172589120629 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143108157739 0.0843802449381 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267382911033 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170312159461 0.0819641961636 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.