The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates how the consumption of different kinds of fast food of teenagers in Australia altered between 1975 and 2000.
In general, the amount of hamburgers and pizza grew significantly whereas that of fish and chips witnessed a moderate decrease over the time frame. In 1975, fish and chips are the most popular fast food among Australian teenagers while in 2000, the first position belonged to hamburgers.
Over 25 years, the consumption of hamburgers and pizza experienced similar trends, both starting at about 10 times eaten per year and reaching 100 and more than 80 times in 2000, respectively. In the first 10 years, the amount of hamburgers consumed rocketed by more than 70 times eaten per year. However, from 1985 onwards, the rate slowed down and leveled off in the last 5 years. Meanwhile, the consumption of pizza grew gradually from 1975 to 1995 and then remained the same until 2000.
In contrast, from 1975 to 1985, the consumption of fish and chips fluctuated between 80 and 100 times eaten per year, then seen a steady drop by approximately 40 times in the next 15 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e amount of hamburgers consumed rocketed by more than 70 times eaten per year. Ho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, then, whereas, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91489361702 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.689449231 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547872340426 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3556649643 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15409598817 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802396871238 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652573943469 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112200735142 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585578170428 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.