The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
The line chart gives information about the consumption of three categories of junk food eaten by teens in Australia between 1975 and 2000.
Overall, it is clear that Hamburgers and Pizzas rank as having the highest numbers of consumption of junk food, whereas there was a gradual decrease in eating Fish and Chips.
In 1975, the most popular fast food with Australian teenagers was Fish and Chips was eaten almost 100 times per year. Next, there was a fluctuation over the next 10 years between 1975 and 1985 before reaching around 90 times. However, the demand for this junk food significantly dropped by approximately 50 times from 1985 to 2000. By 2000, it continued to decrease to below 40 times, which was the lowest point in the entire period surveyed.
In contrast, the popularity of Pizzas and Hamburgers appeared to have taken off significantly. In 1975, Hamburgers and Pizza’s consumption was very low at below 20 times and both increased to roughly 100 and 85 times respectively between 1975 and 1995. The number of Hamburgers and Pizza consumption by Australian teenagers each year remained stable at around 100 and 85 times respectively by 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t point in the entire period surveyed. In contrast, the popularity of Pizzas an...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05154639175 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76746043937 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582474226804 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.8972327994 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.888888889 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15239906773 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683170625848 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452557278471 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0950786043108 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488987644208 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.