The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999, and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The line graph illustrates the number of people who visited to UK and from UK to other nations since 1979 to 1999.There is also a bar graph demonstrating the most and least visited country in 1999 by British people.
Overall, it is clear from the graph that, since the beginning of the mentioned time period large number of the UK residents travelled abroad as compared to visitors travelling to the UK. In the year 1999, France and Spain were more visited by Britisher’s as compared to USA and Greece. Turkey was the least visited nation.
On the one hand, it is clearly seen that around 12 million British citizens visited abroad in 1979 which later increased to 20 million. A dramatic rise in visits to abroad by UK people is seen in 1999 reaching approximately 52 million in gap of eighteen years from 1984. In the year 1979,10 million people visited the UK, slowly increased to about 29 million by the year 1999. It took a span of 20 years to observe this change.
On the other hand, the bar chart shows the most popular destination visited by the UK population being France and Spain counting at 12 million and approximately 9 million respectively. Territories like USA, Greece and Turkey has less than 5 million UK residents visiting them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
... UK to other nations since 1979 to 1999.There is also a bar graph demonstrating the m...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o a bar graph demonstrating the most and least visited country in 1999 by British...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7397260274 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68575454102 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529680365297 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8927544499 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.8 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374316389767 0.215688989381 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148474879202 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112749314872 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256746424646 0.15604864568 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109478843422 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.