The map below shows the changes have taken in village Meadowside and Frontor a neighboring by town from 1962 Sumarise information and make comparison where possible

Essay topics:

The map below shows the changes have taken in village Meadowside and Frontor a neighboring by town from 1962. Sumarise information and make comparison where possible.

The map below provides information about the development happened in a village Meadowside and near by town Forntor from 1962 till now.
A summarized data is in 1962 places were separated and not linked by any mean, but currently two sites merged into one place with a complete city facilities.
In 1962 the Meadowside was a small area with only one sided road and no other structure, the place was without any construction. On the other side Frontor was totally segregated area from suburb with only mudded road. While in 1985 some development observed in second map, a carpeted road replaced the older one in Meadowside, which was also connected with Forton. With construction of road commercial building also started. Along both side of road new housing estate and super store built with leisure center as well. During these years area expanded toward each other.
But in present by expansion of two sites area, its converted into one bigger place with all facilitations. At the point where both site meet on both side of road which link both Meadowside and Frontor Station and children park can be shown in map. A hotel is build between two sites.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
...nt happened in a village Meadowside and near by town Forntor from 1962 till now A summ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
...ith leisure center as well During these years area expanded toward each other But in...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, second, so, well, while, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77664974619 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46324210099 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593908629442 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 197.0 22.4926829268 876% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 941.0 112.824112599 834% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 197.0 22.9334400587 859% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 41.0 5.23603664747 783% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137935081533 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137935081533 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113537929841 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10926285754 0.0819641961636 133% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 99.6 13.2329268293 753% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -120.02 61.2550243902 -196% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 78.9 10.3012195122 766% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.63 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 17.01 8.06136585366 211% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 11.4329268293 507% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 80.8 10.9970731707 735% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 58.0 11.0658536585 524% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.