The maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
The supplied layout compares the appearance of island before and after the construction of tourist facilities on the island.
Overall, it is evident that all the construction have made without causing any harm to the nature that is; without cutting trees.
Now, turning to details the centre of 100m of island was vacant earlier, having some trees on the eastern and western side of the island. Moreover, a beach was also available on the Western side of island. Notwithstanding such facilities it was not suitable for tourism. Therefore, many tourist facilities have constructed to make this island suitable for tourism.
First of all, a pier is constructed so that tourists can visit this island by the means of water transport like boats. Moreover, at the centre of the island reception is built, which is connected to the restaurant through vehicle track. In addition to this, accommodations on the East and West side are connected to each other as well as to the beach through footpath. At the beach, facility of swimming is also made available so that tourist can enjoy swimming as well at this island.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 17, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'detail'.
Suggestion: detail
...thout cutting trees. Now, turning to details the centre of 100m of island was vacant...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed to each other as well as to the beach through footpath. At the beach, facility...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, moreover, so, therefore, well, as to, in addition, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01075268817 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73513810623 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537634408602 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.843711478 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.2 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225095997166 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968012444498 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968611295477 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159439155201 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114197674903 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.