Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots. Why do you think it is happening? It is negative or positive development.
"It has become appallingly obvious that technology has exceeded humans". With the rise in mordernisation a man has transformed tremendouly from walking bare footed to taking first step on moon. This topic asserts that, are jobs performed by machines, negative or positive development? I will examine the dimensions of this topic throughly with examples and assertions and shape up my opinion by the end.
Nowadays, robots have made life easier. Robots are being used at work places more than humans. There are many reasons behind this, such as; its accuracy, quick response, time mangement etcetera. Renouned companies which manufature large scale of products. They prefer machine rather than humans, because a human being may get tired during work which result into delay, whereas, machines are programed to perform specific task in fixed time only. Hence, robots provides more benefits rather than humans.
In addition to this, robots are being used in homes as well, and most of the people use them as status symbol. Since, everyone can not afford robots therefore only rich people buy them to show off their standard of living in society. They use robot maids, which minimises the efforts and time in house hold chores. A survey was conducted in India which reveals that 98 percent of people who have robots at their houses use them only to show off their status in society.
It is evident from the given topic that machines are of great use but like every coin has two sides, robots also have disadvantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, so, therefore, well, whereas, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1280.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07936507937 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45737150817 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670634920635 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4675675573 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3333333333 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108698959319 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0378617711064 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589707730267 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0530468087567 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455761464155 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.