Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should write at least 150 words.

Essay topics:

Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

You should write at least 150 words.

The bar graph illustrates the amount of regular consumption of fruits and vegetables of the UK people (Men, women, and children) in 2002, 2006 and 2010. Amounts are measured in percentages.

Overall, women hold the highest percentage of consumption of fruits and vegetables over the three year period. Children have consumed the lowest percentage of vegetables and fruits. Men were constant in consuming fruits and vegetables.

On the one hand, the amount of consumption of fruits and vegetables in the year 2002 of men and women was almost equal (respectively 22% and 25%) and children consumed only 11%. As the year progressed consumption of fruits and vegetables were increased men, women and children were increased respectively 26%, 32% and 18% in 2006.

On the other hand, consumption of fruits and vegetables is slightly decreased in the year 2010 when compared to 2006. Men were decreased to 24% where women 26% and children dropped to 16%.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23225806452 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84329541626 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 74.0 106.607317073 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477419354839 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.1904270986 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1111111111 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88888888889 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195867647308 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10119862035 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053612123157 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147972661621 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490033133509 0.0819641961636 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.