The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The flow-chart illustrates how used glass bottles are recycled to be usable products.
Overall, it is clear to see that the process has three different stages, beginning with collection of wasted bottles and ending with the finished products ready for sales.
In the first stage, it starts with gathering used bottles at collection points before getting them transported. Then, all the bottles have to be put under high-pressure water and classified into three particular types: brown, green and clear before being delivered to the glass factories. In this place, they are shattered into glass pieces. After that, all the species will be burnt in the furnace under 600°C to 800°C into recycled liquid glass. Then, after adding some new liquid glass, the mixture is shaped in the glass mould into the completed glass bottles. Finally, they are used again as the container of liquid and delivered to the sales locations, such as supermarkets.
- The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and present. Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 56
- Most people try to balance between their work and other parts of their lives. Unfortunately, not many achieve this balance. What are the reasons for this and what can be done to solve this? 73
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 38
- TOPIC 4: Many criminals reoffend after they have been punished. Why do some people continue to commit crimes after they have been punished, and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem? 73
- The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., they are shattered into glass pieces - which will be burnt in the furnace under...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, so, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 779.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22818791946 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54636123823 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637583892617 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.015466846 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.285714286 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109451720556 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515217200897 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425182923867 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0731442121771 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0134784890362 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.