The provided pie chart depicts the major causes of deterioration of quality of agriculture land the world and the table illustrate reasons affecting three distinctive regions in 1990s.
This is discernible from the chart that maximum land was degraded because of over-grazing that was 35%. It was followed by, over cultivation and deforestation with both same at approximately 30%. However, others were the least reason which was 7%.
This is also apparent, from the table that North America was mostly affected by over-cultivation which comprised of 3.3% while deforestation was minimum with only 0.2%. Europe had most land degraded that was 28% and major reason was again over-cultivation. In Oceania over-grazing was highest which was 11.3% but there was no over-cultivation.
From the over all analysis, it is seen that all three causes were having equal effect on world but in regional distribution over-grazing and over-cultivate were main causes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...ons affecting three distinctive regions in 1990s. This is discernible from the chart...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: WHICH_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'which comprised' or 'which consisted of' or 'which was composed of'?
Suggestion: which comprised; which consisted of; which was composed of
...was mostly affected by over-cultivation which comprised of 3.3% while deforestation was minimum wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46308724832 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25761331384 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610738255034 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.5146146388 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.75 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135551343801 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745050998952 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986805650148 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125735808464 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11693292296 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.