The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land become less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart indicates the reasons for agricultural land degradation over the world while the table compares the causes of land degradation in the 1990s in three specific regions: North America, Europe, Oceania.
Globally, 65% of land degradation was caused by animal grazing and tree clearance, constituting 35% and 30% respectively. Another reason for less productive land was due to over-cultivation, which made up roughly 28%. Others just accounted for a minority percentage of 7%.
These causes affected regions differently in the 1990s. Europe had as much as 9.8% degradation due to deforestation while the impact of this on North America and Oceania was minimal, with 0.2% and 1.7% respectively. Europe suffered from a great loss of land (23%) was also due to over-cultivation (7.7%) and over-grazing (5.5%). Oceania, on the contrary, had most land destroyed mainly by over-grazing (11.3%) and the total loss of land was 10% lower than Europe. North America had the lowest proportion of land degradation with a minority percentage of 5% caused mainly by over-cultivation (3.3%) and over-grazing (1.5%).
In conclusion, Europe experienced a great loss of farmland than any other region by deforestation mainly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1025.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39473684211 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25746957518 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584210526316 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.7253758869 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180095639686 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833788563877 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813977310827 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113282697613 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709883199991 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.