The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table show how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart explains why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table depicts the affection caused to three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Overgrazing is the main cause of worldwide land degradation while Europe accounts for the highest of all land degraded.
Oceania has the most land which is degraded by overgrazing, followed by Europe with 5,5%. North America is the third in the rank with the least land. Overcultivation is the second main cause to degrade the land with the largest amount of land focused in Europe. There is no land which is degraded in Oceania but there is still land in North America which is degraded by the same cause.
Deforestation accounts for 30% of the reason which degraded the worldwide land with the largest amount of land in Europe (9,8%). There is hardly any land which is degraded by the same cause in North America but that of the Ocenia is nearly 1/9 as much as that of the Europe. The other reason causing land to degrade accounts for only 7%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, so, still, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72159090909 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46629526721 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454545454545 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4655932663 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215954069526 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119736302458 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0979386549829 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191933648424 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150959270674 0.0819641961636 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.