The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table show how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given are the chart depicting major factors causing the world’s land devastation and their effects in three areas, including North America, Europe and Oceania in the 1990s.
From an overall perspective, over-grazing accounted for the biggest influence on deteriorating the global land, which was followed by deforestation and over-cultivation activities. Meanwhile, there were considerable differences on the impact level of those causes between the region mentioned above.
As is visible in the illustration, the excess of grazing cattle made up the most on harming the worldwide land with the proportion of 35%, preceded by the destruction of forests with the percentage of 30% and 28% was the figure of the damage by cultivating over limit. The remaining proportion of damaging the land of global of 7% was the other reasons.
As far as the regions are concerned, Europe took the highest rate on land deteriorated with the number of 23% in its total land, which was accompanied by Oceania and North America with the figure of only 13% and 5% respectively.
Noticeably, while destroying trees was the main culprits spoiling the land, taking up 9.8% in total 23% damaged land of Europe, over-grazing overwhelmingly made up 11.3% in Oceania’s number of 13% and the agricultural activities exceeding their limits damaged the most in its land.
In conclusion, there were 3 chief culprits responsible for the global land erosion in the 1990s, which affected in the dissimilar manner in each of the areas in the world as mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the chart depicting major factors causi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22177419355 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05779983457 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 283.868780488 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.1773665321 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.875 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127111015261 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601621889065 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384188522544 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0724007834668 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359218700333 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 40.7170731707 179% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.