The pie chart show the investment by the Australian government in energy sectors and the generation of energy from those sources in 2010.
The first pie chart reveals the investments made by the Australian government in six different energy sources while other pie chart shows the amount of electricity produced from those sources in 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the highest amount of money spent for the wind power even though the energy produced by it was very minimal. On the other side, coal was the prime element accounted for the power generation; however, the solar power was the last on the list of resources.
As far as the invested revenue in different sectors is concerned, almost half of the total investement was used for the wind and solar power with 42% and 8% ,respectively. After the huge investment for the wind power, the second most money occupied sector was the nuclear by 21%. The coal industries got only one tenth of it while natural gas accounted for only 6%. The other types of sources budgeted for 13%.
On the other side, the contribution of all sources for energy generation led by the coal industries with almost half of the total production, followed by the natural gas, which produced 27% of it. The usage of the nuclear power was only 22% in order to generate it, while wind power and solar created only 2% and 1% of it, subsequently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the wind and solar power with 42% and 8% ,respectively. After the huge investment ...
^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...money occupied sector was the nuclear by 21%. The coal industries got only one te...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her types of sources budgeted for 13%. On the other side, the contribution of a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73271889401 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50539565119 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506912442396 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1474074017 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.111111111 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262173335714 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110717178703 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1638370402 0.0843802449381 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198790230656 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.210737797813 0.0819641961636 257% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.