The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts providing the information of the average household expenses in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
In Japan health care made up the smallest segment of the chart, which was the 6%, followed by transportation services with 20%. In contrast, other goods and services was the largest part of the chart with 29%, followed by food consuming, housing with 24% and 21%, respectively.
However, in Malaysia, housing made up 34% of the chart, which was the largest portion. Besides, food and other expenditures were made up the 27% and 26%, respectively. Nevertheless, health care was the smallest segment of the chart.
As an overall trend, in both countries money that spent on household goods and consuming were the largest fraction of the charts, followed by food. Whereas, dough that spent on healthcare and transportation services made up the smallest part. Additionally, in both of them money that spent on food is roughly same.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 31, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...e chart. As an overall trend, in both countries money that spent on household goods and...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, nevertheless, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07051282051 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84293968431 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1666155105 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8888888889 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144522173784 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781215748245 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129001780034 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146126490326 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169599442958 0.0819641961636 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.