The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
The pie charts compare the proportion of the average household (housing, transport, food, health care, and other goods and services) in japan and malaysia in 2010.
Overall, it is clear in both countries spent the largest proportion of the total expenditures which was housing, food, and other goods and services. And the lowest proportion was on health care.
As it can be seen that in malaysia the highest percentage 34% was in housing. While in japan housing was 21%. japan spent the highest category on other goods and services was 29%, this was higher than in malaysia which was 26%. In term of food is the second highest proportion in both countries, malaysia got 27 % was more that in japan which was 24 %. The proportion on transport in japan got 20 % was more than in malaysia at 10 %. And the lowest proportion in both countries was heatlh care, in japan got 6 % was more than in malaysia which was 3 %.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...owest proportion was on health care. As it can be seen that in malaysia the hig...
^^
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... highest percentage 34% was in housing. While in japan housing was 21%. japan spent t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Japan
...ousing. While in japan housing was 21%. japan spent the highest category on other goo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 756.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.725 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48785699519 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 72.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0699006798 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7777777778 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.44444444444 5.23603664747 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171065862327 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928669698442 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0949612053095 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162070813714 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136550192715 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.