Plan A below shows a health centre in 2005. Plan B shows the same place in the present day.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant.
The two diagram compares structural changes of a health center of 2005 to present day.
Overall, the health center increased it's area and facilities and some of the rooms loose it's space.
In 2005, the health center had parking spaces, physiotherapy room, office, reception desk and 3 other room. The entrance was on the front side of the building and in front of the building there was parking space for 12 vehicles. Reception desk was almost to the center of the house with seating arrangement close to it. It also had a garden outside the home.
However, in the present day, the health center has changed a lot. The entrance has been moved to the South West side of the building. The reception desk is just near the entrance and there is also children's playing area, which is a new inclusion. Parking space has been added in North West direction and consequently, parking spaces has increased from 12 to thirty. A new operation room is been added near the Physiotherapy room. There is a room named CR4 added in main building and as a result other rooms loose some of it's spaces.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 66, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...r increased its area and facilities and some of the rooms loose its space. In 2005, the he...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 84, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...ea and facilities and some of the rooms loose its space. In 2005, the health center ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66145833333 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47618321009 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489583333333 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.6152335399 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.5833333333 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.2329268293 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.