The plans below show the information on the first floor of a particular library in1995 and the same area at the present time. Select the main features shown below and give comparison where relevant.
The two pictures show the area and decoration changing of the first floor in a particular library in the year 1995 and now. It seems this library become easier to find particular area and is cut off some parts with time goes by.
In 1995, when visitors entered the library by entrance in map’s bottom, they first saw three areas, study tables and chair, a small book display platform and an area which provide newspapers for people to read. They located in the central. However in nowadays the central area is occupied by the book display. Then in the left hand, visitors could find local reference books in 1995, and now it changes into area which hold new books. In 1995 the library has place where behind the local reference books area for people to use computers. But it had no internet access. But now the place is full of chairs and the computer area has occupied the place where provided reference books and maps in 1995. Also now the library can serve internet access toward its visitors. The librarian’s desk replaced by self-service desk and the only area that has no change is the photocopiers which visitors can see in the right hand of the entrance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...e to read. They located in the central. However in nowadays the central area is occupie...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
...d. They located in the central. However in nowadays the central area is occupied by the boo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 705, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...vided reference books and maps in 1995. Also now the library can serve internet acce...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70531400966 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39799483709 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56038647343 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.8404437986 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5454545455 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141417850269 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584087500643 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569025971191 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146651186261 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628641247892 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.