The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
First Grange Park, whose style is rectangular, opened in 1920. People were able to have access to the park through the two entrances, the one for Arnold Avenue and the other for Eldon Street. The main features of the previous park were the fountain in the center of the park, the stage for musicians on the left, the glasshouse next to the entrance facing Eldon Street, and the pond for water plants in the corner on the upper right. Furthermore, there were three rose gardens which are located on the both sides of the gates except for the entrance facing Eldon Street due to the existence of the glasshouse.
By contrast, new Grange Park has almost completely altered its floor plan in significant ways. To begin with, the location of the rose gardens has been changed and replaced in the center of the park with four seating areas along the four lines except for the remaining one close to the upper left corner. Moreover, there is an amphitheater for concerts in front of semicircle-type seating areas with two aisles where the ex-stage used to be. In addition, the pond has been replaced by the children's play area near the new cafe where one of the rose gardens existed and the glasshouse has (been replaced) by the water feature. More significantly, there have been two entrances, but today, people can enter the park from the third one through the underground car park.
In conclusion, there are various kinds of alternation in the Grange park due to the passing time, but the essential functions such as rose gardens, the concert area and the water area have remained.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, third, except for, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 965.302439024 143% => OK
No of words: 282.0 196.424390244 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90780141844 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70220211733 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 106.607317073 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517730496454 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 417.6 283.868780488 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.3855576843 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.4 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 5.23603664747 206% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147806670601 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073413937829 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648977952986 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0916880955191 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366420625575 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.