The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pictures illustrate the modifications that took place in a public park called Grange between 1920 and nowadays.
It is noticeable that 4 main changes were made to the park involving the establishment of an amphitheater, a rose garden, an area for children playing, and a water feature.
In the westernmost of the park, the stage for musicians and two seating areas were removed in favor of an amphitheater for concerts due to entertaining purposes. Also, while the rose garden in the northeast area remained unchanged, the one which was opposite was demolished. In addition, the fountain positioned at the center of the plan was converted into a rose garden surrounded by seating areas in all four directions.
On the east side of the park, where there had been the pond for water plants and the glasshouse, there were then a children’s play area and a water feature respectively replacing them. Additionally, a café was constructed, which has necessitated the removal of the rose garden in the northeast corner. When it comes to the entrance areas, while two entrances still existed in the same location as in 1920, there was an entrance underground car park built.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by seating areas in all four directions On the east side of the park where there...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88265306122 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86258137642 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55612244898 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 196.0 22.4926829268 871% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 957.0 112.824112599 848% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 196.0 22.9334400587 855% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 45.0 5.23603664747 859% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144468106643 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144468106643 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10203542068 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386515243645 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 99.6 13.2329268293 753% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -119.0 61.2550243902 -194% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 78.5 10.3012195122 762% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.21 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 16.98 8.06136585366 211% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 59.0 11.4329268293 516% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 80.4 10.9970731707 731% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 59.0 11.0658536585 533% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.