Some countries have young population trend instead of ageeing one. Some people consider that having large number of young adults than number of elder people have many advantages while other think that this case will cause many drawbacks to country. This essay will analyse both sides of the argument before arriving at a reasoned conclusion.
Firstly, it is generally accepted that young people can change their attitudes as per the need and always challenge the old style of thinking. On the other hand, young adults are more healtier than older people. Therefore, they need less spending on healtcare and can work under the pressure than the elderly. Secondly, young people are the main source for manual work. Companies can easily find employees because there will be many candidates to choose. That's why, many people are sure that having more young adults than older people is positive impact on the country's development.
Despite these advantages, other people think that if countries consist of higher number of young adults than older people, countiries will face lots of problems. Firstly, youngt adults will not be mature enough to take risky decisions because their experience will be less than elder people. Secondly, unemployment rate will be high if countries can not supply working field to these young adults. If unemployment rate becomes high, joblessness can lead to an increase in criminal activities. Thirdly, young adults must gain experience by working with older people. With the help of it, they can be good at work, otherwise they can not be successful.
In conclusion, even though both approaches have their advantages and disadvantages, I am convinced that this has more drawbacks than its benefits. There must be a balance between these two age groups. Experience is the best teacher and we can gain experience with older people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...here will be many candidates to choose. Thats why, many people are sure that having m...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'can' requires base form of the verb: 'work'
Suggestion: work
...ill be high if countries can not supply working field to these young adults. If unemplo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 1.00243902439 1895% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 5.60731707317 410% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 965.302439024 162% => OK
No of words: 301.0 196.424390244 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19933554817 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51529904495 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 106.607317073 154% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544850498339 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 283.868780488 167% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 8.94146341463 201% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3134502171 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9444444444 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7222222222 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206920414659 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709348326904 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599980478445 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137384462775 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604102059318 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 40.7170731707 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.