At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?
The issue of whether a country will benefit from a relatively large number of young adults is really complex. Some people might think that young people are more energetic and contribute higher GDP of the country, while others might believe that older people with more experience can provide wise advises to others. This essay outlines two aspects to show way a larger number of young adults brings more advantages than disadvantages.
To begin with, although the elder may have more experiences and can share some wise advices to people, their experiences may not so useful in the modern society. For example, older people who were born much earlier before the technology revolution could not share how to use social media such as “FB” or “Instagram”. In addition, because younger individual usually have more innovative ideas than the older individual, it is crucial to invent better product and create new business model. Therefore, a country with more young adults can build a more creative society.
Furthermore, a population with relatively large number of young adults can contribute higher GDP growth. First, more young adults mean more people can joint labor market and increase national income. Second, old people who are retired normally live by spending their saving; however, it will not contribute the productivity of the country. Thus, the national economics will benefit from the population with higher proportion of young adults.
To sum up, in my opinion, the advantage of the situation outweigh the disadvantage because young adults compose a more innovative society and create a powerful economics.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, may, really, second, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 1.00243902439 1297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 258.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38372093023 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83504015441 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577519379845 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 283.868780488 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1949494916 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.75 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0833333333 5.23603664747 250% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233785171507 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096680834665 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074726951421 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147905501368 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474937497027 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 40.7170731707 179% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.