There is growing evidence that man-made activities are making global temperatures higher.
What might be the man-made causes of temperatures rising? How should we deal with this problem?
Recently, more researches indicate that human beings are contributing the global warming. The essay will outline what habitants’ activities are likely to accelerate the increase of temperatures and how the trouble can be solved in the future.
To begin with, according to scientists, the emissions of greenhouse gas such as CO2 are the main factor of greenhouse effect. With the development of modern society more people are wealthy enough to own private vehicles such as cars and scooters for transportation. However, the CO2 that emitted by those machines is one major source of greenhouse gas produced by habitants. In addition, the deforestation by multinational companies in rainforest area such as Brazil and Indonesia also makes the problem worse since trees can absorb enormous CO2 produced by human activities through photosynthesis.
To deal with the issue, there are some actions that we can do. In the short term, citizens can try to take metro or buses rather than drive their own cars to work and use more recycled papers in the office. In the long term, governments should invest more on environmentally-friendly industries such as public transportation, recycling eco-systems and clean energy. In addition, councils need to formulate the law to limit the logging activities in forests.
To conclude, vehicle that release CO2 to the air and deforestation by international company are to blame for global warming. To solve the problem, habitants can drive less and use recycled more papers; and the authorities should develop environmentally-friendly industries and reduce deforestation through regulations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...recycling eco-systems and clean energy. In addition, councils need to formulate th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, in addition, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52589641434 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49417608594 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589641434263 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3269226027 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.583333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128861301657 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472882379994 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440333258569 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822885933971 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480337654905 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.