process diagram analysis
The given diagram demonstrates the step-by-step process of utilizing the waste chaos of newspaper, grass and left-over food to result in the compost used for garden-related tasks.
Overall, there are five stages during this process, beginning with the materials preparation and completing the final step with the compost product.
In the first step, it stably requires an empty bottle with several holes punched at two sides for the in-and-out air flow. Subsequently, all the waste-related materials will be given to the ready-made bottle, which should be guaranteed that the height for a layer of newspaper, grass and food may be piled in the same distance, about 15 cm. After that, the following stage will need two additional substances for catalyzing the reaction, specifically nitrogen and water. Notably, in order to gain the efficiency of this process, it is necessary in adjusting the appropriate the temperature of the liquid influx; in this circumstance, hot water is the sole choice for the success of this reaction. Next, the exothermic reaction will occur; therefore, the heat of the process will release through an array of holes made previously. After 6-month waiting period, the mixture will be thoroughly transformed into the compost used for versatile garden-based purposes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 72, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'materials'' or 'material's'?
Suggestion: materials'; material's
...during this process, beginning with the materials preparation and completing the final st...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1094.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38916256158 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96676896156 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630541871921 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7425396044 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.75 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104131146992 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045743604236 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522027070524 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915273020653 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446067183827 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.