Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today’s society. To what extent do you agree with this view ?
Advancement in technology has widened up boundaries of promoting products in various ways compared to a couple of decades ago. However, people, including me, have a view that all the techniques used for selling products might be unsuitable for society and economically for today’s generation which impacts adversely more than positively which will be analyzed in the ensuing paragraph.
To begin, there are plethora of advertising techniques available compared to a decade ago when only hoardings and paper distribution were existed while current publishing method on worldwide website has undoubtedly increased their profitability and distribution rate. For instance, social networking sites such as Facebook and WhatsApp are full of advertisement by sponsor.
On the flip side, all these ideologies are not morally admissible at all. Dealer frequently target soft aspects of society which are younger and children and put forth an advertisement to compel them and eventually force them to buy unnecessarily. For instance, most attracted sales comes out on special occasion which offers either higher discounts on unsaleable items or giving ‘buy one get one free’ which in my perspective unacceptable owing to the fact that children frequently attracts to these deals and parents as being their beloved never want to make them unhappy and end up purchasing redundant item.
In conclusion, a manufacturer have numerous ideas to sell their items worldwide, yet it is immoral sometimes when it affects people therefore a number of stringent steps need to put forward in order to protect society’s ethical values and our future from being bleak in the coming years.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, therefore, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 259.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48648648649 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97727713301 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 106.607317073 169% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.694980694981 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 283.868780488 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.7005687677 43.030603864 225% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 177.625 112.824112599 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.375 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0894975070747 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0337606373428 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0275352508505 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0490394493895 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195490359912 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.6 13.2329268293 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 61.2550243902 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 10.3012195122 165% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.89 8.06136585366 135% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 40.7170731707 228% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.