It is often thought that new and young workers should not replace experienced but old workers in an industry. In my opinion, both novice and expert workers work hand in hand to establish a healthy work environment in industries and experienced workers should not be completely replaced by inexperienced unskilled ones.
Firstly, young workers are physically stronger than their older counterparts and hence, can easily complete tasks which involve lifting or pulling heavy objects and instruments. For instance, a young worker is much more efficient and adaptable when it comes to tasks involving work during night shifts and holidays. Furthermore, new workers are enthusiastic and keen individuals who can learn to work on newer machines easily whereas old workers prefer to work on older machines and are not amenable to changes.
However, experienced workers in industries are used to working on machines, equipment etc. which rarely changes and are also aware of their shortcomings. Also, skilled workers know machines inside out whereas a novice unskilled worker doesn't even know how to operate them. Moreover, a skilled labor can guide newer inexperienced individuals bits and pieces of work to be done in an industry and eventually turn them into skilled ones.
To conclude, a skilled labor is as essential as an unskilled one in an industry. They both integrate together in order to form a sustainable industry.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e out whereas a novice unskilled worker doesnt even know how to operate them. Moreover...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, whereas, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1203.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32300884956 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88307189158 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570796460177 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0877103335 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.363636364 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5454545455 5.23603664747 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206714893542 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085855609474 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773007581256 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127433182895 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730787814305 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.