Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.
It is commonly believed that music is one of the best ways that can be used to bring people regardless their cultures and ages together. Personally, I completely agree with this point of view.
On the one hand, there are a wide range of international songs that are popular among different cultures. These range from American rock-and-roll to Korean pop music. People, who are interested in them, tend to discuss about their favourite music and pop stars on the internet using social networking websites such as Facebook where can be found different musical social groups filled by people who are from different part of the world. Furthermore, it has become commonplace that well-known bands or solo artists perform throughout the world, and everyone seems to be satisfied with that. If people listen to such songs, they will be able to learn other cultures, as it is represented in them.
On the other hand, almost every culture has its own traditional music which has been handed down from previous generation to another. They are treated with respect equally by both elderly people and youngsters. It is hard to imagine when traditional festivals, religious rituals and marriage ceremonies, where all age of groups held, without traditional music. In addition, it is common in the majority of cultures to teach younger generation about their cultural heritage through folklores. This responsibility tends to be taken by elders and adults who have deep understanding in their cultural music.
In conclusion, I do agree that music can bring together not only different cultures, but also different ages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 3.15609756098 412% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 5.60731707317 446% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 965.302439024 140% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16091954023 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77028186648 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 106.607317073 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613026819923 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 283.868780488 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 1.53170731707 653% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8654380936 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.615384615 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 5.23603664747 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280176784844 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963452465617 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693088659949 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198586065453 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768389344002 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.