There is no doubt that todays generations are tomorrow's citizens. There has been heated discussions as to decide whether parents or schools are responsible to mould perfect future citizenry. In this discussion,both the views are examined in detail to arrive at a tenable opinion.
On the one hand, as a basic unit of society, it is the duty of each families to lay the foundation of good social manners in a child. It is only from the grown up, their young ones learn how to be in a public space or what are the socially accepted actions. For example, majority of toddlers acquire basic linguistic skills before they join a school, so that they always imitate their guardians language and behaviour. Also, a pre schooler learns about honesty and truthfulness that are essential qualities, from home. Hence it goes without saying that parents do have an inevitable role in implanting social virtues on their offsprings.
On the other hand, as a bigger form of society, students could learn much more about social norms and responsibilities from the educational institutions. It is from there they learn to co operate with others and to obey the authority. Along with academics, each member of the faculty teaches them how to be in a social situation. Moreover, learning about the history and culture enhances the feeling of patriotism which is the pavement to become good citizen in their upcoming lives. Finally, good interpersonal relationships and communication skills are easily acquired by the aspirants from the school environment. Teachers could use their commanding power also to teach the duties to the students.
Having analysed both the perspectives, even though both parents and school are equally responsible to develop law abiding populace, I personally believes that teaching centres held higher role in this,as the growing pupil spend majority of their time in such institutions and gain knowledge about the outside world.
Therefore, both family and schools have remarkable duties in the formation of fine future citizens, however, the role of schools are far higher in this scenario.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , both
...ect future citizenry. In this discussion,both the views are examined in detail to arr...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tail to arrive at a tenable opinion. On the one hand, as a basic unit of soci...
^^^
Line 4, column 520, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...hat are essential qualities, from home. Hence it goes without saying that parents do ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 436, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ling of patriotism which is the pavement to become good citizen in their upcoming...
^^
Line 8, column 146, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'believe'
Suggestion: believe
...elop law abiding populace, I personally believes that teaching centres held higher role ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 201, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , as
...eaching centres held higher role in this,as the growing pupil spend majority of the...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, hence, however, moreover, so, therefore, as to, for example, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 5.60731707317 410% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 965.302439024 184% => OK
No of words: 341.0 196.424390244 174% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20234604106 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 3.73543355544 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85390735598 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 106.607317073 191% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598240469208 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 283.868780488 196% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1180396575 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.875 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 3.70975609756 323% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224949536486 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656362143742 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429971639788 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122845775392 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199885455279 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 40.7170731707 248% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.