The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The table indicates information about changes in models of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. Overall, an average English person in 2000 traveled much more than in 1985.
In 1985, a person traveled 4740 totally in average. Car was the most common vehicle, which accounted for 3199 out of 4740 miles. Walking, local bus and train were the typical means of transport, which a person traveled 255, 429 and 289 miles, respectively. Bicycle, long distance bus and taxi were uncommon vehicles while their distance traveled per person were only 51, 54 and 14 miles. Other modes of travel accompanied 450 miles per person.
In 2000, there had been a sharp increase in travelling while the distance an average person covered raised from 4740 to 6475. The number of distance travelled by car went up, either, from 3199 in 1985 to 4806 in 2000. Walking, local bus and train were still common modes of travel, but contrary to the increase in the distance covered by train, from 289 to 366 miles, walking and local bus became less common. Taxi and long distance bus had witnessed and increase, 13 to 42 miles and 54 to 124 miles respectively, bicycle were less used as a mean of transport, the distance went down from 51 to 41. Others accounted for 585 miles per person, which is 135 miles more than 1985.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1079.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73245614035 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34417002751 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530701754386 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6420174524 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9166666667 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129190504816 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719567661385 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105877541704 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135401279449 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108997896791 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.