The two maps illustrate road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010. Overall, traffic infrastructure outside the hospital had changed a lot after 3 years.
In 2007, the neighborhood around the hospital was rather simple. Ring Road surrounded the city hospital, and to the south of the hospital, Hospital Road gave access to 6 bus stops lying opposite each other. There was a car park for staff and public lying on the east of the Hospital Road, from there access to the city hospital is available in the north side. The City Road is perpendicular to the Hospital Road.
In 2010, a great deal of new infrastructures had been added to the surroundings of the hospital. There were 2 roundabouts in the intersection between Ring Road and Hospital Road and the interchange between City Road and Hospital Road. 6 bus stop had been replaced by a bus station, which could be approached through the two roundabouts. The old car park had been expanded into 2 sections, the car park for hospital staff was in the same location as the old car park, while the new space for public vehicles lies on the east of the hospital. Direct access to the hospital is all available in the two parking lot.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'bus' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'buses', 'busses'.
Suggestion: buses; busses
...ospital, Hospital Road gave access to 6 bus stops lying opposite each other. There ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65876777251 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70696197511 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473933649289 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.111991211 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3636363636 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.818181818182 5.23603664747 16% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25566667439 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13792940369 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119696564463 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22201757939 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595140736493 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.